2018-03-28

[#DIV28SUPER] Kratom Science letter to DEA and the White House

Can you please post this on the Division 28 List Serve – Signatories of this letter include several Division 28 member including myself.

Thank you, Jack

 

Jack E. Henningfield, PhD

Vice President, Research, Health Policy, and Abuse Liability

PinneyAssociates    | pinneyassociates.com

phone:  301.718.8440    ǀ  jhenning@pinneyassociates.com

Science. Strategy. Solutions.

4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 400

Bethesda, MD  20814

Email: jhenning@pinneyassociates.com
Web site: www.pinneyassociates.com
and
Professor, Behavioral Biology, Adjunct
Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland 21287

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity indicated above and may be confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at 301-718-8440 and delete all versions of this message. Thank you.

 

Re: [#DIV28SUPER] Kratom Science letter to DEA and the White House

Send it directly to div28super@lists.apa.org
You will get any replies (instead of me

Best

Ron
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 7:59 AM Jack Henningfield <jhenning@pinneyassociates.com> wrote:

Can you please post this on the Division 28 List Serve – Signatories of this letter include several Division 28 member including myself.

Thank you, Jack

 

Jack E. Henningfield, PhD

Vice President, Research, Health Policy, and Abuse Liability

PinneyAssociates    | pinneyassociates.com

phone:  301.718.8440    ǀ  jhenning@pinneyassociates.com

Science. Strategy. Solutions.

4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 400

Bethesda, MD  20814

Email: jhenning@pinneyassociates.com
Web site: www.pinneyassociates.com
and
Professor, Behavioral Biology, Adjunct
Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland 21287

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity indicated above and may be confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at 301-718-8440 and delete all versions of this message. Thank you.

 

_____________________________ div28SUPER@lists.apa.org
Div28m members may post here list archive
twitter: @apadiv28 #div28

[#DIV28SUPER] Kratom Science letter to DEA and the White House

Can you please post this on the Division 28 List Serve – Signatories of this letter include several Division 28 member including myself.

Thank you, Jack

 

Jack E. Henningfield, PhD

Vice President, Research, Health Policy, and Abuse Liability

PinneyAssociates    | pinneyassociates.com

phone:  301.718.8440    ǀ  jhenning@pinneyassociates.com

Science. Strategy. Solutions.

4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 400

Bethesda, MD  20814

Email: jhenning@pinneyassociates.com
Web site: www.pinneyassociates.com
and
Professor, Behavioral Biology, Adjunct
Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland 21287

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity indicated above and may be confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at 301-718-8440 and delete all versions of this message. Thank you.

 

2018-03-27

[#DIV28SUPER] EXCITING CHALLENGES FOR THE NEXT GENERATION

            (New comment on graduate education in psychopharmacology by Pat DeLeon )

 Psychopharmacology (RxP):  In response to the steadily growing interest in psychopharmacology among our profession's next generation of leaders, and especially those students currently in graduate school, APA is seeking public comment on the proposed modifications to the 2009 RxP model Curriculum, model Designation Criteria, and model Legislation pursuant to a Task Force recommendation.  The Task Force was chaired by Ronald Brown.  It had been approved and subsequently convened by BEA, BPA, and CAPP in 2017, holding an-in person meeting at the end of that year.  Their 2018 recommendations, if approved as APA policy, would make clear that it would be appropriate to provide the didactic portion of the psychopharmacology training during graduate school.  Of historical interest, in 1997 APAGS adopted a formal resolution of support for RxP.

            This year the American Psychological Foundation (APF) issued a call for submissions for the Beth Rom-Rymer Scholarship program which will provide up to nine scholarships to support both graduate students and practicing licensed psychologists to complete their RxP training.  This is in addition to the APF Walter Katkovsky research grants supporting research on the general topic of combining psychotherapy and psychoactive medications, where the medication is an adjunct to psychotherapy and not the primary intervention.  Nearly 30 applications were received for Beth's award, clearly reflecting growing enthusiasm for RxP which her efforts, and especially the successful Illinois legislation, have generated within the field.  We would be pleased to learn of interprofessional efforts conducted by State Associations and individual psychologists integrating the expertise of our colleagues in nursing and clinical pharmacy in the training of our next generation.  As a profession, we seem to under-appreciate the significance of the fact that those seeking mental and behavioral health care remain the same individual, regardless of which professional discipline they ultimately chose to work with.  Remaining in isolated professional silos would seem to be counterproductive at best.

The Exciting Advent of Telehealth:  With the ever increasing sophistication occurring within the communications field and the steadily declining cost of the technology, not to mention the ease with which the younger generation relates to this development, there can be little doubt that the future of health care will become increasingly reliant upon its utilization.  The Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense have been on the cutting edge of utilizing telehealth (e.g., telepsychology) and have had outstanding results, with mental health being a major focus.  Colleagues report that their younger clients often prefer utilizing this technology to in-person encounters.  The quality of care appears to be equivalent.  For those in the private sector, licensure mobility is a major issue which must be addressed.  Under the visionary leadership of Steve DeMers, CEO of the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB), the APA Council of Representatives endorsed in principle their Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT), a joint initiative with APA and The Trust, during our Denver convention.  The proposed "E-Passport" would allow the provision of psychological services by qualified licensed psychologists via electronic means across jurisdictional boundaries, without additional licensure in the jurisdiction in which the client was physically present when receiving services.  Three states have already endorsed the Compact with similar efforts underway within the Advanced Practice Nursing (APRN) community.  Steve reports that at least seven states must affirmatively enact the Compact legislation in order for psychology to establish a meaningful presence in this new and evolving environment.  Is your State Association affirmatively addressing this critical issue?  Aloha,

Pat DeLeon, former APA President – Division 31 – March, 2018

 


2018-03-23

[DIV28ANNOUNCE] Division 28 newsletter

Good afternoon APA Division 28,

 

Attached is the March issue of the division newsletter.  Enjoy!

 

Regards,

Erin McClure 

 

 

----------------------

Erin A. McClure, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Addiction Sciences Division

Medical University of South Carolina

67 President St, MSC 861

Charleston, SC  29425

Phone: 843-792-7192

Fax: 843-792-8206

 

 

Like us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter!

 

 

 

2018-03-03

Re: [#DIV28SUPER] Fwd: just posted....

I agree that there is a way in which the dueling petitions is a bit silly. It has us looking at the wrong things, and arguing about the wrong things.  But, it does also reflect emotional reactions (from different sources), which is worth reflecting on. 

The 45,000 number is misleading, as some on the Division 39 listserve have acknowledged.  Many signatures are from general members of the "public" and not from psychologists, APA members, or even mental health professionals.  I do not know what public listserves it went up on about a week ago and suddenly pushed the numbers from several thousands to over 27,000 and then over 45,000.  Someone on the Div 39 listserve estimated that 4,000 signatures were from APA members (in 39 as well as other Divisions) and maybe another thousand or two from non-APA member psychologists and a few from other mental health professionals.  Some have argued that the "public" signatures represent a statement of more general "public opinion." -- which should be considered in some way.

I am sure that people signed one or the other petition for many and varied reasons.  The challenge here is to make reason and logic the core issue.  What do we know, and what do we know from various sources and levels of data?  Fighting and name-calling will not advance high quality psychological services.  Thoughtful reflection and summaries of what we know and do not know -- and how well that does or does not map onto the clinical needs presented by the American public is what we need to stay focused on.   Gary

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Sher, Kenneth <SherK@missouri.edu> wrote:
Forwarding because, in my opinion, the development of clinical practice guidelines is the most valuable activity that APA has attempted in decades. To "roll them back" (and put a damper on those that are forthcoming) would be a scar on the APA and a major setback for the profession. While I think the whole "petition thing" is silly...these are issues for informed debate...not a popularity contest. However, I do think that it useful to demonstrate that support for the guidelines effort is broader and deeper than is characterized in the note Mitch Prinstein forwarded. Consequently, I hope you sign the "pro guidelines" petition.
Kenny

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Prinstein, Mitch" <mitch.prinstein@UNC.EDU>
Date: March 3, 2018 at 8:10:43 AM CST
To: <SSCPNET@LISTSERV.IT.NORTHWESTERN.EDU>
Subject: just posted....
Reply-To: "Prinstein, Mitch" <mitch.prinstein@UNC.EDU>

The following quote comes from a post to several listservs…..

 

"The petition opposing the APA PTSD guidelines has over 45,000 signatures, and the number of signatures has been increasing daily.  The Petition supporting them has 1700 signatures, and that number has basically been unchanged since the first few days it came out.  If the number of signatories is representative of our profession, for every person who supports the guidelines, there are over  25 who oppose them.  Those who beat the drum for "evidence based therapy" are NOT representative of psychologists' views.  They are a tiny minority, but they make the most noise and have completely dominated dialog - in APA, in health insurance policy, in public policy - for decades. Our field has been hijacked by a tiny and highly non-representative minority, who have managed to consume virtually all the oxygen there is."

 

If you disagree, I hope you have:

  1. signed the pro-guidelines petition - https://www.thepetitionsite.com/780/537/970/support-the-apa-ptsd-treatment-guidelines/
  2. and forwarded the link to every human you know with strong encouragement to vote
  3. Surely, everyone on this list, every faculty member, and every graduate student, every psychologist involved in training, and everyone among our professional colleagues totals more than 1700 people….right?

 

 

 

 

_____________________________ div28SUPER@lists.apa.org
Div28m members may post here list archive
twitter: @apadiv28 #div28


_____________________________ div28SUPER@lists.apa.org
Div28m members may post here list archive
twitter: @apadiv28 #div28

[#DIV28SUPER] Fwd: just posted....

Forwarding because, in my opinion, the development of clinical practice guidelines is the most valuable activity that APA has attempted in decades. To "roll them back" (and put a damper on those that are forthcoming) would be a scar on the APA and a major setback for the profession. While I think the whole "petition thing" is silly...these are issues for informed debate...not a popularity contest. However, I do think that it useful to demonstrate that support for the guidelines effort is broader and deeper than is characterized in the note Mitch Prinstein forwarded. Consequently, I hope you sign the "pro guidelines" petition.
Kenny

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Prinstein, Mitch" <mitch.prinstein@UNC.EDU>
Date: March 3, 2018 at 8:10:43 AM CST
To: <SSCPNET@LISTSERV.IT.NORTHWESTERN.EDU>
Subject: just posted....
Reply-To: "Prinstein, Mitch" <mitch.prinstein@UNC.EDU>

The following quote comes from a post to several listservs…..

 

"The petition opposing the APA PTSD guidelines has over 45,000 signatures, and the number of signatures has been increasing daily.  The Petition supporting them has 1700 signatures, and that number has basically been unchanged since the first few days it came out.  If the number of signatories is representative of our profession, for every person who supports the guidelines, there are over  25 who oppose them.  Those who beat the drum for "evidence based therapy" are NOT representative of psychologists' views.  They are a tiny minority, but they make the most noise and have completely dominated dialog - in APA, in health insurance policy, in public policy - for decades. Our field has been hijacked by a tiny and highly non-representative minority, who have managed to consume virtually all the oxygen there is."

 

If you disagree, I hope you have:

  1. signed the pro-guidelines petition - https://www.thepetitionsite.com/780/537/970/support-the-apa-ptsd-treatment-guidelines/
  2. and forwarded the link to every human you know with strong encouragement to vote
  3. Surely, everyone on this list, every faculty member, and every graduate student, every psychologist involved in training, and everyone among our professional colleagues totals more than 1700 people….right?