As APA considers commenting on NIDA’s Draft Strategic Plan, I would appreciate hearing from Division 28 and 50 members to better understand how well the draft reflects (or doesn’t) the science you’re interested in. What’s laudable? What’s missing? What’s overemphasized? What’s under-represented?
Comments are due October 27 and I’m hoping to synthesize input starting the week of the 19th, so if possible, please send me your thoughts between now and then. Thanks very much for your help.
Geoffrey K. Mumford, Ph.D. | Associate Executive Director for Government Relations
P Most people consider the environment before printing their email.